| |
|
  |
SANEI:
Completed Studies: Abstract
Health Policy Challenges in India: Some Lessons from the International Experience
This study attempts a comparative analysis of Foreign Direct Investment(FDI)
in Chinese and Indian economic development. The stylised facts of such
a comparison are well known. In volume, FDI in China exceeds that in
India many-fold, not withstanding strong doubts about the reliability
of Chinese official statistics in this area. In China significant inflow
of FDI began at least a decade or so earlier than in India, due to the
early origins of reforms dating back to 1979 in China as against 1992
in India.
The sources of FDI in the two countries have been very different. Chinese
FDI is dominated by East Asian sources, particularly Hong Kong and Taiwan
and mostly from expatriate Chinese population, whereas NRI investment
in India has been abysmally low. The study finds that investments by
large transnational corporations in both countries have been primarily
oriented to the domestic market and to infrastructure development. Low
wage costs have also been an added attraction for MNCs to investment
in these two locations. However, in both, MNC investment responses have
been delayed. In China, it has by now acquired substantial momentum
but it is yet to take off in India.
Expatriate investment in China has essentially been a process of relocation
of export oriented simple labour intensive manufactures from the neighbouring
expatriate settlements into China. This process has been facilitated
by China's low wages coupled with rapid growth of manufactured exports
globally. However India's failure to tap NRI investments may be attributed
to the risk averse nature of the Indian diaspora, lack of learning process
in managing export oriented labour intensive manufacturing, and the
lack of a decentralised sanctioning mechanism for FDI in India.
Download in
pdf format
|
 |

|
 |